Current Affairs


ruthginsburgThe aptly named website “Jezebel” has the Ginsberg eugenics faux pas wrapped up. Those of you who have taken logic at the undergraduate or above level might want to sharpen your pencils and take notes.

In a later interview, the author of the NYT piece, Emily Bazelon said:

“…it was clear that when Justice Ginsburg said ‘we,’ when she was talking about populations that we don’t want to have too many of, she meant some people in the world, not herself or a group that she feels a part of. That’s not how she sees the world, as you I’m sure know. Her point was about other people’s conception of who they thought should be encouraged to have children and who shouldn’t be, not her own.”

In other words, the Supreme Court Justice can’t convey the simple grammatical difference between first, second, and third person singular and plural.

“We” is the new “they” I suppose.

Somebody we really want on SCOTUS?

Do the people who work at sites like Jezebel understand that they’re making their subjects look even more stupid than they did before they started sucking on their toes?

What exactly is an "asocial worker"?

What exactly is an "asocial work professor"?

Things are pretty bad when the largest newspaper in Indiana contains a typo in the second column of the day’s top story.  Don’t believe me?  Check out the picture to the left. 

What happened here?  Several possibilities come to mind:  The Indianapolis Star relies on spell check to proof copy; the editors all left their glasses at home that day; they were trying to save space by eliminating the real estate between “a” and “social”; they didn’t think anybody would notice since nobody in Indiana reads anymore; there actually is such a thing as an “asocial work professor”. 

If the last case is correct, I don’t know if Ms. Adamek appreciated being listed in the same category as disgruntled postal workers and bureaucrats. 

Dictionary.com (yes, I know I’m lazy) lists asocial thusly:

asocial (ey-SOH-sh-uhl):
–adjective
1. not sociable or gregarious; withdrawn from society.
2. indifferent to or averse to conforming to conventional standards of behavior.
3. inconsiderate of others; selfish; egocentric.
Get on the ball, Ms. Adamek!  Your reputation is under attack.

Should we look at this from a right/wrong perspective?  Or should we do what is in the “best interest” of the American public?  That really isn’t the full range of choices we face.  Have we really become that stupid?  Rescuing the crooks who got us into this mess isn’t going to solve anything.  I want heads on platters.  I want execs and CEOs doing jail time.  I want assets seized.  In a free market economy (play by the rules or there is no game) you go out of business because you deserve to go out of business.  It is a matter of right/wrong.  The bailout is wrong.